A comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in a high volume percutaneous coronary intervention center

    在线阅读 下载PDF 导出详情
    摘要 BackgroundLargepercutaneouscoronaryintervention(PCI)centershaveshownstatisticallybetterprognosiswithtransradialapproach(TRA)comparedwithtransfemoralapproach(TFA).SowetriedtocomparetheoutcomesbetweenTRAandTFAinonehighvolumePCIcenterinST-segmentelevationmyocardialinfarction(STEMI)patientsundergoingprimaryPCI.MethodSixhundredandsixtytwoSTEMIpatientswhounderwentprimaryPCIwithstentsimplantationwereretrospectivelyincludedfromJune1,2006toApril30,2011inourhospitalandprospectivelyfollowedforoneyear.Theprimaryendpointwasdefinedasin-hospitalnetadverseclinicalevents(NACE)whichincludeddeath,myocardialinfarction(MI),stroke,targetvesselrevascularization(TVR)andmajorbleeding.Thesecondaryendpointwasdefinedas1yearmajoradversecardiovascularevents(MACE)whichincludeddeath,MIandTVR.ResultsTheoccurrenceratesofNACE(8.0%vs.17.0%,P=0.0018),accesssitecomplications(4.0%vs.10.7%P=0.0027)andaccesssite-relatedmajorbleeding(2.4%vs.6.3%,P=0.0254)wereallhigherintheTFAgroupthanintheTRAgroup.Theincidencerateof1yearMACEwassimilarbetweenTRAandTFA(8.5%vs.13.2%,P=0.0932).TheinverseprobabilitiesweightingmatchedmultivariableCoxregressionanalysisshowedTRAwasanindependentpredictoroflowerratesofin-hospitalNACE(HR:0.58,95%CI:0.34-0.99,P=0.0477),in-hospitaldeath(HR:0.31,95%CI:0.10-0.73,P=0.0499)andaccesssitecomplications(HR:0.37,95%CI:0.19-0.73,P=0.0040).ConclusionsTRAshowedgreatefficacyandsafetyforSTEMIpatientsundergoingprimaryPCIinhighvolumePCIcenters.Itshouldberecommendedasroutinepracticeinfuture,andespeciallyinthosepatientswithhighriskofbleeding.
    机构地区 不详
    出版日期 2014年01月11日(中国Betway体育网页登陆平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)
    • 相关文献
    Baidu
    map